SIR in Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh: Officials address the Public Issues

Report by a first-time voter

Aishwarya Siingh

BAJMC Sem 2


Source: mint

(The author visited the SIR booth at Gandhinagar Kukra, MuzaffarnagarUttar Pradesh,  in November 2025)

Read on to know the challenges the officials face in the process


·      VENUE: SIR BOOTH, Gandhinagar Kukra, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, November 25, 2025

During the Special Intensive Revision, the author got the opportunity to visit the SIR Booth and speak to the government representatives present there and involved in the process of SIR.

Siingh spoke to,

Prashant Kaushik: Supervisor

Being the supervisor of the SIR booth, what are the main problems which you are facing almost every day and what are the hurdles or inefficiencies of the administration in the process?

"The challenges I am facing as a BLO (Booth Level Officer) are that people have been given very little time to conduct this, and completing it by December 4th is nearly impossible. The government has not promoted the SIR properly. No specific bulletin has been issued, so there is a lot of confusion among the people, and they don't understand how to go about doing this. There is a great deal of pressure on every single BLO; going to people's homes and asking them to do this—people are not responding properly. Not everyone is aware or informed enough to carry this out.

There is a lot of confusion in people's minds regarding the SIR; they do not know what this thing is. There is a heavy dependency on BLOs because people who are scared want to sit with the BLO and write every single line by asking them. Even educated people, who actually know stuff, are doing the work in this same manner. Additionally, some people are very reluctant regarding this process and are not taking the Voter ID seriously. They have an attitude of, 'if it happens, it happens; if it doesn't, it doesn't'.

And those who feel that they will not be able to prove that matter properly, or that they do not have proper documentation as such, are trying to avoid this. It's not that they are wrong; it's just that they are worried about whether their form will be submitted properly, whether it will be possible or not, and whether their documentation will be accepted or not. Out of this fear, they are not engaging with this process correctly. Even when going house-to-house to conduct the survey, people are slamming doors in their faces and behaving rudely. There is pressure on the BLOs to conduct a very high number of surveys in a very short amount of time, which is almost impossible.

And the biggest query I have encountered as a BLO among the people is this: people feel that if they cannot properly prove that they fall under the Election Commission and that their name is on the list, they will be sent away from here—they will be sent to Bangladesh or Pakistan.

There have been issues due to the little to no use of technology right from the district level. The mechanisms are faltering, as each BLO is being assigned 1,100 to 1,200 forms that are supposed to be filled online. However, the system glitches frequently, and the average time to fill a form is around 12 minutes. The filtration process could have been conducted much more efficiently if the 2003 voter list, which was also recorded in the Vidhan Sabha, had been used. If during the ongoing filtration, additional categories such as father's name, mother's name, and date of birth had been incorporated into each column, the process would have become significantly easier. Following this system, nearly 40% of the voters could have been filtered out, leaving only about 16% pending. Moreover, the selection of BLOs was not very prudent. Many BLOs are elderly and face difficulties with technology, which in turn is slowing down the entire process."

Ajay Kumar: Record Officer / Patwari

What are the common challenges you are facing in this process of SIR?

"In the old booths, there were only two to three booths, so it was easier for people to find their names in the list. For example, in the Kakra region, there were 10 booths earlier, and now there are 13. So, among 13,000 people or 10,000 people, it is becoming difficult for individuals to find their names. People are facing the most trouble regarding this specific issue; this is the primary difficulty they are encountering. There are many women and other people who are illiterate and have no idea what is happening; they simply don't understand the process. Because of this, a door-to-door campaign is being conducted in the villages. While it is easy to perform verifications in well-planned colonies where houses are numbered (like House No. 1, 2, 3, 4), it is becoming extremely difficult to carry out this work in unplanned colonies."

Q. There is a common fear that what will happen if people are not able to prove their name in the list, not to mention people are scared they might lose their citizenship?

"This is Phase 1 currently. If you cannot prove your status in Phase 1, your phone number and address are being recorded. You will then be given another opportunity in Phase 2 to establish your citizenship. During that second phase, specific documents will be requested to prove you belong here. Your citizenship would only be subject to cancellation if you fail to provide those documents—at least, that is what the government is currently planning."

Archana Singh: BLO

What was the role of a BLO in the SIR? And what all work was there? And what was the SIR?

"In this SIR process, the BLO is the only official who has direct contact with the voter. Or you could say, only the BLO remains in direct contact with the voter. The responsibility for getting the voter to fill out the form was given to the BLO. The responsibility of collecting the forms from the voters and putting them online was also with the BLO. This means the BLO is the smallest unit of this entire process. In the SIR process, the BLO was given 'Ganna Prapatras' (enumeration forms). The responsibility to deliver these to the voters, collect the completed forms, and upload them online was given to the BLO. All of these responsibilities rested solely with the BLO. The responsibility of delivering notices and collecting documents from voters whose names are not in the 2003 voter list—meaning 'no mapping' voters—has also been given to the BLO.

In the SIR process, the Election Commission of India checks the eligibility of citizens. The aim is to ensure that no foreign or invalid voter is enrolled in the voter list. In a way, this is a screening process. Through this process, voters who have left one place for another, deceased voters, and those enrolled in more than one location are screened out. This results in the preparation of a clean voter list. At the same time, new voters who are 18+ can also enroll themselves in the voter list, leading to the creation of a new, updated list."

What were the challenges you faced as a BLO during the process of SIR?

"The time limit was very short and the workload was very high. Voters were also very scattered, and house numbers were not clear. There were voters who had come and settled from outside, due to which they were very confused about providing their 2003 list—regarding which place they had voted in 2003 and which voter list their name was on. Many voters were very confused and quite scared even when their names were found in the 2003 list. Voters from the same family were on the lists of three different BLOs. Along with this, those voters with double enrollments verified their names in one place. However, the BLO from the other location kept searching for them because the voter was now unconcerned since they had verified their name. But the BLO could not find the voter, which caused them stress.

Along with this, a cause of stress for the BLO was that they were assigned 20 hours of work daily. Besides this, the BLO's own family responsibilities were suffering. Their families were being disturbed, which was having a very negative impact on their mental and physical health. Many people were being rude and behaving improperly toward the BLOs. When BLOs had to conduct door-to-door surveys, many neighbors and other people would slam the door in their faces, not open the door at all, ignore them, or tell them to leave in a disrespectful manner. There were no properly sanitized restrooms for the BLOs. There were no proper arrangements for food and water. The booth was not a comfortable environment for the BLOs to work in.

Many educated people—individuals who are well-educated, university professors, prominent teachers, and businessmen—were not willing to write even a comma or a full stop in the form without the BLO's attention. Because the forms had to be filled both online and offline, the average time to complete just one form was 12 to 15 minutes. With an average BLO having to fill between 1,200 and 1,500 forms, the time required for each individual form was becoming excessive. There were many elderly BLOs who were quite advanced in age or were not very technologically savvy. Additionally, the BLOs were not given any proper training on how to carry out the SIR process. Everything was expected to be done in a very short amount of time, which created a lot of chaos."

Bharti Malik: BLO

As a BLO, according to you, what are the common problems the general public is facing?

"To prove your voter status, you need to show the name of either your mother, father, grandfather, or grandmother in the 2003 electoral list. Providing the name of any one of these four individuals will suffice.

Voter lists aren't just about adding new people; they also involve removal. For example, if a woman gets married, her name is removed from her original location and added to the voter list where she now resides. Similarly, many people who have passed away still have their names on the active voter list. This entire process is essentially a 'filtration' of the voter list to ensure it is accurate and up to date.

 


When Voters' Data Meet Reality! - On the Ground Impact of SIR 2026 in West Bengal

An opinion piece by a young voter

Souvik Mukherjee 

MAJMC Sem 4

Revised Schedule of SIR
Source: From the Official handle of Chief Electoral Office, West Bengal ceowestbengal.wb.gov.in
 

In West Bengal, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) 2026, which began as an administrative activity, has now become an experience that many thousands of voters have had to live with.

Several districts of West Bengal have experienced significant amounts of notices, hearings, document verification, and doubt as it relates to current voter registration versus older election data, especially regarding the 2002 Voter List. The issuance of an unprecedented number of notices sent to voters, many of which have been categorized as logical discrepancies, ASD (Absentee, Shifted and Dead) unmapped situation, etc. has been one of the most visible impacts at the ground level of SIR.

For many long-term voters, this has been the first time they received notification that their eligibility was being challenged and questioned after participating in more than one election cycle. Often, voters are made to attend verification hearings at block/subdivision offices as part of their appeal process. The challenges this has created for rural communities are significant. Many elderly people, individuals with disabilities, low-wage earners, and migrant workers have difficulty making long-distance trips, sometimes necessitating multiple trips within a short period of time. In some districts, this has resulted in public protests to have hearings conducted closer to polling locations.

Many voters have experienced repeated verification problems, particularly with regards to the old-style (pre-2002) voter data from the 2002 election. In some cases, where there are disputes about the latest electronic database mapping records correctly, references are being made back to the old-style (pre-2002) electors’ rolls for verification because the names of many voters are included in the older electors’ rolls but do not exactly match the names on the most recent electronic databases, many of these voters have been flagged for hearing. The small discrepancies in age, spelling, or address that have accumulated over several decades have resulted in some voters receiving notice of possible hearings or having to produce documents of proof of identity for voting purposes. For some of the older voters, especially those over 60, producing the required documentation has been a significant burden.

Voter documentation without reliable confirmation continues to be a major issue for many. Many constituents reported submitting identity and address verification documents during hearings or by using the verification process but were subsequently told that there was no record of their submission. In many instances, a receipt or written acknowledgment was not provided. The absence of traceability has caused increased concern among voters who were already being considered "not found" or "unmapped." These constituents now fear that the lack of documentation regarding their submissions may result in being deleted from the final roll because of a gap in the process, as opposed to ineligibility.

The increasing reliance on digitization throughout the SIR process has added to the pressure on voters and their rights, particularly where previously handwritten records in a regional script are being translated to digital formats via Standardization. Small discrepancies- spelling variations, estimated birth dates and different structures of address, have resulted in many of these records being reported as mismatched and therefore requiring subsequent verification. Many voters report receiving multiple phone calls regarding their records after making corrections to them, resulting in the perception of a repeated process rather than a resolved one.

For voters who are migrant workers or employed outside of their home districts, the difficulties of attending hearings scheduled with little notice often result in the voters having to make difficult decisions about whether to prioritize their livelihoods over compliance with the electoral process. As a result of the issues outlined above, voters report increased anxiety related to the electoral process. Many reports confusion with respect to the process, fear of being removed from the electoral roll and distrust of inconsistent communications regarding their voting record.

While the SIR 2026 project is designed to enhance the accuracy of electoral rolls, it appears that there is a conflict between the administrative verification process and the convenience of voters, which may affect the efficacy of the SIR process as to whether or not genuine voters feel to have been supported and protected during the process.

West Bengal will soon publish its final electoral roll. The process of Special Intensive Revision remains ongoing, with significant administrative and social challenges associated with the implementation of this program. Through the course of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), it was demonstrated how large and complex the task was to keep accurate databases of voters due to continued migration, vast differences in language, and the many years of records that had developed prior to the development of electronic records systems. The process of verification is critical to maintaining the integrity of an election; however, based on the experiences that have emerged on the ground, how the process is implemented may be equally as important as what is intended through the implementation.

Therefore, the final outcome of the SIR 2026 may not only depend on the level of accuracy of the databases produced but also on whether the process provides voters with the confidence that voter inclusion is the expected outcome through the system used.

 

Read more:

Sr Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the ECI, stated that

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/sir-verification-of-citizenship-only-for-electoral-purposes-the-method-is-liberal-soft-touch-eci-tells-supreme-court-519854