Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts

Salaried for Surveys, Empty in the Classroom: How Administrative Duties are Hijacking Public Education

An opinion by

Aishwarya Siingh

Pexels

The persistent claim that public schools are achieving parity with private institutions is being fundamentally undermined by a systemic redirection of resources that prioritizes administrative data over student learning. Currently, a staggering 90% to 95% of the teaching workforce in Uttar Pradesh has been removed from the classroom to serve as Booth Level Officers (BLOs) for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) survey. This administrative overreach has left schools in a state of functional paralysis; while students continue to attend, they find their classrooms empty of instructors. Only headmasters and supervisors remain on the premises, acting as mere caretakers rather than educators. This results in a miserable waste of the students' most formative years, as the core objective of the institution—the delivery of a curriculum—is completely suspended in favor of government surveys.

This crisis is not an isolated incident but rather a symptom of a perpetual cycle of non-teaching assignments that treat educators as an all-purpose administrative workforce. Beyond the current SIR survey, teachers are already being earmarked for duties involving the upcoming National Census (Janganana), followed by the Panchayati and Vidhan Sabha elections. Even in the rare windows when they are not in the field, they are frequently pulled away for mandatory training sessions, ensuring that their presence in the classroom is a rarity rather than the norm. By the time one government task concludes, the next begins, leaving the public education system in a permanent state of neglect. There is currently no mechanism for accountability or a platform for the public to question why election logistics are consistently placed above the academic future of millions of children.

Ultimately, the government's strategy reveals a troubling prioritization of fiscal utility over educational quality. The primary aim appears to be the total exhaustion of the salaries paid to teachers by utilizing them for every conceivable state function except for actual teaching. This approach renders the government’s promises of "reliable education" hollow, as the "Right to Education" cannot be upheld in an environment where the teacher is perpetually absent. While private school students advance through their studies without interruption, public school students are left behind by the very state that claims to protect their interests. Until the government separates pedagogical duties from administrative labor, the public school system will remain a building without a soul, and its students will remain casualties of bureaucratic convenience.

 (Author's own opinion)

Celebrating Ritwik Ghatak's Centenary: A Timeless Commentary on Partition and its Global Relevance

Sourav K Basu

Assistant Professor

Amity School of Communication

Amity University, Kolkata

Description: A photograph of Ritwik Ghatak from his early years, likely taken around 1950 when he was active in the Indian People's Theatre Association (IPTA). License: Public Domain (image published before 1950)

My coming to films has nothing to do with making money. Rather, it is out of a need to express the pains and agonies of my suffering people.

Ritwik Ghatak, “My Coming Into Films”

In 2025, we mark the centenary of Ritwik Ghatak—an auteur who remains one of the most powerful and poetic voices in Indian cinema. His legacy remains strikingly relevant, especially in the context of the global refugee crisis. Whether due to the ongoing crises in Bangladesh, Syria, or the Ukraine-Russia war, the world faces a wave of displacement and migration, themes Ghatak explored deeply in his films. His works resonate with the current human struggles of refugees, making his films increasingly important in global discussions today.

Though his life and career were both tragically brief, Ghatak's legacy looms large over the cultural landscape of South Asia and beyond. More than a filmmaker, he was a seer—one who captured the trauma of Partition not just as a historical rupture, but as a spiritual wound, a lingering fracture in the human psyche that continues to haunt generations. As the world grapples with forced migrations, statelessness, and identity crises, Ghatak's work feels startlingly prophetic.

During my time in Mumbai starting in 2008 with Zee News & Aamir Khan Productions for ‘Satyamev Jayate’, I had the opportunity to visit FTII Pune several times to attend seminars, guest lectures, and technical workshops there. I observed the deep respect for Ghatak's memory, including a wall mural commemorating his time at the institute. Ghatak had served as Vice President of FTII from 1965, and his influence is still felt there.


Ritwik Ghatak's workspace archived at FTII, Pune Pic Courtesy: S.K.Basu 
 

A wall graffiti at FTII, Pune Pic Courtesy: S.K.Basu 

At FTII, Pune Campus, 2010 Pic Courtesy: S.K.Basu 

The Man Behind the Camera

Born on November 4, 1925, in Dhaka (then part of British India, now the capital of Bangladesh), Ritwik Ghatak experienced Partition firsthand. His family's migration to Kolkata was not just a geographic shift but an emotional and psychological schism that deeply informed his artistic sensibilities. Initially drawn to literature and theatre, Ghatak eventually found in cinema a medium expansive enough to contain his anguish, his anger, and his hope.

His filmography is lean but incandescent. While commercial success eluded him in his lifetime, posthumous appreciation has only grown, particularly among filmmakers, historians, and cinephiles who regard him as one of the few directors who dared to look at India’s Partition not merely as a political event but as an existential crisis.

Supriya Devi from Meghe Dhaka Tara


 The Partition as Living Specter

The Partition of 1947 uprooted millions, tore apart families, and sowed seeds of communal distrust that have yet to be reconciled. While mainstream cinema largely glossed over these harsh realities or romanticized them into digestible tropes, Ghatak delved deep into the emotional core of the tragedy.

In Meghe Dhaka Tara (1960), arguably his most acclaimed film, Ghatak uses the story of Neeta—a self-sacrificing refugee woman in post-Partition Kolkata—as a metaphor for the nation itself.

Similarly, in Subarnarekha (1965), Ghatak explores the taboo of incest and the desperation born of rootlessness, underscoring how displacement fractures not just geographies but moral and social orders. These are not just stories of refugees but stories of erosion—of culture, identity, and human dignity.

 

Global Echoes: Why Ghatak Matters Today

The world is witnessing unprecedented refugee crises—from Syria to Sudan, Myanmar to Ukraine. Borders continue to be drawn and redrawn with tragic consequences. The themes that Ghatak explored—displacement, identity loss, cultural amnesia—resonate deeply in today’s fractured world.

In many ways, Ghatak's films serve as a lens through which we can understand the universality of Partition-like traumas. His insistence on remembering, on mourning, on resisting the erasure of history, is a powerful antidote to the homogenizing forces of nationalism and cultural sanitization.

Ghatak also challenges us to rethink the role of art and the artist. In a world increasingly driven by algorithms, franchises, and formulaic storytelling, Ghatak's cinema is a reminder that art is also witness. That the camera can record not just faces but feelings, not just events but their echoes.

 Ritwik Ghatak Commemorative Stamp (2007)
      Description: An image of the Indian postage stamp issued in 2007 to honor Ritwik Ghatak.
License: Public Domain (government-issued stamp)
Source: Wikimedia Commons

Legacy and Reclamation

It is perhaps fitting that Ghatak has found more recognition internationally than in the mainstream Indian cinematic canon. Filmmakers like Martin Scorsese and Kumar Shahani have acknowledged his influence. Institutions across the globe now screen his restored films, and academic studies continue to unearth the layers of his work.

On the centenary of his birth, retrospectives, symposiums, and re-releases are beginning to reclaim his rightful place in cinematic history. But more importantly, they offer a moment for collective introspection—for remembering not just a man, but the questions he posed, questions that remain painfully unresolved.

A partition picture in 1947. Refugees crossing the border in East Bengal Source: Wikipedia

Conclusion: A Cry Across Time

In Komal Gandhar (1961), another of Ghatak's masterpieces, the backdrop of Partition serves as a canvas for exploring fractured political ideologies and the difficulty of healing. Yet even in its bleakness, the film gestures toward hope—through love, through solidarity, through art.

Celebrating Ritwik Ghatak’s centenary is not just about honoring a cinematic genius. It is about engaging with a conscience that never stopped probing, never stopped feeling. His films compel us to acknowledge the wounds of the past, not to dwell in them, but to ensure we do not repeat them.

In an era of curated forgetting, Ghatak reminds us of the power of remembering—and the sacred responsibility of bearing witness.

 



The Rising Trend of Instagram Induced Digital Infidelity amongst Urban Gen Z

Gen Z and Instagram bond

Anisha Ray

Assistant Professor

Amity School of Communication, Kolkata


By Pexels

In the vibrant tapestry of India’s metropolitan cities, where tradition blends seamlessly with modernity, a new challenge is reshaping the dynamics of young love: digital infidelity fueled by Instagram. Among Gen Z—those navigating life in bustling cities like Mumbai, Delhi, and Bengaluru—this social media giant has become both a bridge and a barrier in romantic relationships. While it fosters connection and self-expression, it also introduces subtle, often unspoken threats to emotional loyalty.

Instagram’s allure lies in its visually immersive storytelling. For urban Gen Z, it serves not only as a digital diary but also as a symbol of social relevance. Stories, reels, likes, and DMs are the lifeblood of interaction. But these seemingly innocent features often blur the lines between casual engagement and emotional intimacy with strangers. A 2023 study showed that 68% of Indian Gen Z users spend over two hours daily on the platform, with many admitting to forming “close” connections with people they’ve never met in person.

These interactions—flirty comments, suggestive emojis, and late-night DMs—may not involve physical contact but still spark feelings of betrayal. Such digital infidelity chips away at trust, creating insecurities and fostering anxiety in relationships. In cities where young people are embracing global ideals of autonomy while still grappling with traditional values of commitment, the tension is palpable. A seemingly harmless “like” on an influencer’s sultry photo or a cryptic story reply can trigger suspicion, jealousy, and spiraling arguments.


By Pexels

This erosion of trust also takes a toll on mental health. The constant comparison to idealized online personas, the fear of being replaced, or not being “enough” for a partner can lead to anxiety, low self-esteem, and even depression. Relationship counsellors report a growing number of urban Gen Z clients seeking help not for infidelity in the conventional sense, but for the emotional distance and insecurity stemming from online behaviors.

Adding to this complexity is peer pressure. In a culture where likes, followers, and “aesthetic” content are social currency, many Gen Z individuals feel compelled to maintain a curated version of themselves. This often leads to the creation of parallel identities—one for real life, and another for public digital


consumption. These split personas can create cognitive dissonance, as individuals struggle to reconcile their authentic feelings with the pressure to appear desirable or unattached online.

Addressing digital infidelity requires more than policing behavior—it calls for intentional conversations about boundaries and digital loyalty. Instagram is not inherently toxic, but its misuse, especially in the absence of trust and communication, can destabilize even the strongest bonds. As India’s cultural landscape continues to evolve, Gen Z must learn to use social media not as a test of love, but as a tool for meaningful connection and mutual respect.


Platter of Heritage: Transgenerational Tales of Gastronomy

Food and Cultural Bond

 Dr. Shatabdi Som

Assistant Professor

Amity School of Communication, Kolkata


Weaving tapestry of memories, cultural identities and geographical abundance, ‘food’ has always been the universal bond between tradition, nutrition and storytelling. Every household has secret Sunday recipes, lunchbox stories, festive and community meals nourishing generations with its gastronomic delights.  Stories were woven during each harvest and passed on to generations in the form of intriguing narratives. “We sun dry the mustard plants, grind and blend with a traditional rice soup during the winter”, recounts a group of rural women of Purulia, inheriting the recipe from their ancestors. The culinary conversions transcending generations preserve the family meal practices ensuring nutrition strengthening family and societal bonds.


 

  Rural women narrating food stories   

                        Sun dried mustard greens                         

 

An enthusiastic Instagram food blogger recounts how her grandparents managed to feed the uncountable migrants during the 1971 partition even during the acute shortage of food.  It is through her Instagram page she narrates these stories and  even after decades those recipes were rediscovered and has effortlessly managed to be a part of the transgenerational platter surviving the test of time. More than sustenance, food and communication have achieved a stature of empowered narratives of abundance & love, scarcity & hardship, migration & resilience influencing food preferences and cultural identity. A group of craftsmen travel from Chhatna (Bankura, West Bengal) to the outskirts of Purulia to make data palm jaggery. Living in makeshift setups made of bamboo and palm leaves, they engage themselves  in a tedious process from collecting the syrup to finally making the jaggery, narrating the stories of how they learnt the skill from their fathers.

 


Jaggery (nolen gur) artisans at work in Purulia

 

Metaphorically, food remains an eternal touchpoint in the cinematic narratives of Ghatak, Rossellini and Chaplin. Ghatak’s protagonist in ‘Meghe Dhaka Tara’, Neeta, skips meals representing the turmoils of the partition narratives; food serves as connection between the communities during theatre rehearsals symbolising food as a metaphor for memory, identity, gender, and displacement. When the impoverished localites stone the bakery in Rossellini’s ‘Rome-Open City’ tells stories of hunger, and oppression under a fascist regime. A poignant depiction of starvation in the tragicomic moment of the shoe-eating scene in Chaplin’s ‘Gold Rush’ epitomises the desperation for food.

Documenting food in media texts captures the essence of cultural identity, family and societal history. The social media driven communication archives and embraces the story of culinary traditions honouring the past and enriching the present and future, resonating the flavours of heritage through storytelling. Narrating stories of food goes beyond culinary instructions; capturing the essence of history and traditions.

 Pic Courtesy: Dr. Shatabdi Som