Showing posts with label Aishwarya Siingh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aishwarya Siingh. Show all posts

Unveiling the Feminine Psyche: ASCOPE Attends Lopamudra Banerjee’s Book Launch ‘How Does It Matter?’

Book Launch Report

Aishwarya Siingh

BAJMC Sem 3


The book and the launch event attended by the city's well-known dignitaries

The launch of Lopamudra Banerjee’s book, How Does It Matter? Portrait of the Artist as a Woman, took place on Tuesday, September 1, 2026, at 6 PM at Cafe I Can Flyy Tea Kafi in Ballygunge, Kolkata. Representing the Amity School of Communication (ASCO), the gathering provided a deeply intellectual and emotionally charged space to celebrate poetry over prose as an essential, moving medium capable of expressing what prose often cannot reach. The event was graced by Chief Guest Moon Moon Sen, former Member of the Lok Sabha and celebrated actress. The evening’s discourse was brilliantly navigated and moderated by arts and events curator Oindrilla Dutt, alongside a panel of distinguished intellectuals, including author, scholar, and women's rights activist Jael Silliman, writer and diplomat Roma Bhattacharjea, and acclaimed film director Sudeshna Roy. Rooted deeply in her cultural origins, Banerjee’s voice resonated powerfully across the room, leaving attendees with the uncanny feeling that each verse held up a mirror to their own inner worlds and lived experiences.

Author, Lopamudra Banerjee

The central narrative of the panel discussion delved directly into the heart of the anthology, a collection of 80 fiercely feminist poems designed to give authentic, unyielding shape to the complex identity of women. The panelists praised Banerjee for her rare ability to distill profound human experiences into just a few visceral, carefully crafted words, leveraging intense and striking female imagery to explore raw themes of despair, systemic discrimination, betrayal, dislocation, and the fragile struggle to preserve sanity. A significant portion of the discourse focused on how societal structures consistently suppress women across all dimensions—emotionally, mentally, and intimately—pointing out how rarely a woman’s genuine desires and agency are acknowledged in her physical or sensual relationships. Through non-linear storytelling influenced by the raw, unbridled intensity of Sylvia Plath and showcased in evocative pieces like The Kali and Dancing in the Rain, Banerjee captures both the emotional weight of 18 years of togetherness and the terrifying sensation of being out of control, alongside the transcendent hope embodied by children dancing amid life’s sudden storms.

Audience at the event

Ultimately, the event brought into sharp focus the reality that this collection was created not for commercial gain or mass consumption, but rather for a niche audience—for literary scholars, women's studies enthusiasts, and the starving artist within who continually returns to poetry for personal salvation. The dynamic arc of the poems functions like a prism of light, wherein dark imagery of blackness, thunder, lightning, and rain undergoes a dramatic metamorphosis into the fertile, reborn essence of caustic breath, fresh blood, and renewed vitality. The influence of travel and venturing into unknown places was highlighted as a critical catalyst that expands an author's knowledge without severing ties to the places and values already known. The evening concluded with a shared reverence for the transformative weight of language, leaving no doubt that through Banerjee's courageous writing, even the most isolated and suppressed corners of female existence can find a lasting voice, a place of belonging, and ultimate liberation.

 

Mastering Modern Storytelling: Abhinav Decodes Micro-Dramas, Series Bibles, and AI in Media

Report

Aishwarya Siingh

BAJMC 3


Abhinav Banerjee at the session 

The Amity School of Communication (ASCO) hosted an engaging guest lecture titled "From Words to Worlds: The Journey of a Story from Script to Screen" on August 24 at  Big Studio convened by Prof. Moumita De Das, ASCO. The session featured guest speaker, Abhinav Banerjee, who was felicitated by Prof. (Dr.) Akash Deep Muni, Dean of ASCO. Abhinav, an accomplished Creative Producer with extensive experience in digital-first storytelling, audio series, micro-dramas, and AI-assisted productions, brought rich industry insights—drawing from key projects like the AI-assisted YouTube series Blood Boy and successful vertical micro-dramas such as Crypto King and Nafrat—to offer students a realistic and forward-looking view of the entertainment ecosystem.

The Convenor Prof. Moumita De Das along with the guest

Banerjee opened the session by unpacking foundational narrative theory, focusing on Christopher Booker’s classic concept that all storytelling across books, movies, and serials is rooted in just 7 basic plots. He illustrated how timeless tropes—such as Revenge, Rags to Riches, and Forbidden Love—continue to dominate modern entertainment. Unpacking audience psychology, he explained why viewers consistently devour cliché plotlines. With a lighthearted example, he highlighted the famous Indian serial trope where a wronged character fakes their death and returns for vengeance: despite no plastic surgery, a simple change of makeup, outfit, or addition of eyeglasses magically deceives lifelong acquaintances. Though absurd on paper, these recognizable tropes remain effective because they fulfill specific emotional payoffs that audiences crave.


Abhinav Banerjee interacting with ASCO students

Moving into practical production frameworks, Banerjee demystified the process of crafting a series bible—the blueprint that locks in tone, character arcs, visual rules, and episodic structures for serial content. He explained how modern creators construct show bibles to keep long-running narratives consistent, and highlighted how industry professionals increasingly leverage generative AI tools to draft, structure, and refine these bibles seamlessly. He then detailed the explosive growth of vertical micro-dramas and bite-sized episodic content. Major streaming platforms and dedicated apps (such as Disney+ Hotstar, ReelShort, DramaBox, and EIGHT’s Vertical TV) are rapidly launching specialized verticals for micro-content. He further explored how artificial intelligence is reshaping end-to-end creation, with creators employing generative AI workflows—utilizing tools like Claude, ChatGPT, Nano Banana Pro, Google Flow, Seedance, and Cinema Studio—for everything from storyboarding and music composition to generating full-scale AI movies.

The two-hour session was highly interactive. Banerjee showcased screenings of his own micro-dramas and an AI-generated movie, followed by an entertaining game where students identified famous film characters and quoted their iconic dialogues. Closing with practical career advice, he urged aspiring media professionals to build strong personal brands on Instagram and LinkedIn to showcase their portfolios and network effectively within the rapidly evolving entertainment industry.

 

 

The Double-Edged Digital Resistance: How Meme Culture Powered—and Polarized—the NEET-UG Agitation

Aishwarya Siingh

BAJMC Sem 3


Meme fest during Jantar Mantar Protests

The NEET-UG paper leak scandals and systemic exam delays threw the lives of over 2.4 million medical aspirants into total chaos, triggering an unprecedented wave of rage that brought Jantar Mantar to a complete standstill. Behind the slogans lay a grim reality: India’s pressure-cooker competitive exam culture has reached a breaking point, with National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data revealing over 13,000 annual student suicides—a devastating 70% surge over the last decade. In coaching hubs like Kota, where over 23 student suicides were recorded in a single year, systemic paper leaks and arbitrary evaluation schemes felt like the ultimate betrayal. Driven by desperation, unaligned students alongside decentralized youth groups like the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)—a movement birthed satirically after a senior legal official disparagingly compared protesting youth to "cockroaches"—transformed Delhi’s central protest hub into an explosive epicenter of Gen Z resistance. The movement erupted into a national flashpoint in late June when activist Sonam Wangchuk joined CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke at the site and launched an indefinite hunger strike in solidarity with the students. Protesters bypassed traditional media altogether, using Instagram Reels, broadcast channels, and location tags to mobilize tens of thousands within hours.



At the absolute center of this new protest style was a vibrant, irreverent brand culture built on Gen Z meme mechanics and sharp satirical placards that turned Jantar Mantar into a viral online memefest. Banners across Sansad Marg displayed bold personal-meets-political humor, with viral signs reading "My ex and this government are both heartless," "When will democracy open a customer care," and "Ikea has better cabinets." Pop-culture crossovers thrived, from subverting the Mahabharata where Krishna tells a stressed minister to "Resign kar yaar tu pehle," to making cheeky references to Melody toffees ("Melodi Khao, Khud Jaan Jao"), parodying traditional protest tropes with banners like "Simon, Come Back," and crafting viral Instagram Reels that gamified police chases into real-life Subway Surfers. Crucially, posters reading "Nobody funds me, I hate this government for free" carried immense geopolitical significance: following successful youth-led Gen Z uprisings in neighboring nations like Nepal that triggered regime changes, political opponents and internet theorists began circulating claims that American agencies or covert foreign forces were funding the Jantar Mantar mobilization. By turning that specific conspiracy theory into a viral punchline, the students directly disarmed state narratives. This distinct meme language served as an extraordinarily powerful force for democratization: it stripped away dry policy jargon, translated complex institutional failure into punchy digital content, sustained student morale across weeks of oppressive heat and police surveillance, and forced the entire nation to pay attention. By replacing rigid political hierarchies with hyper-relatable internet culture and decentralized digital coordination, a leaderless student collective successfully outmaneuvered traditional state suppression, forced mainstream news networks to cover their demands daily, and proved that viral digital solidarity can translate directly into physical political pressure.

However, this heavy reliance on meme culture, brand mechanics, and internet antics proved to be a double-edged sword, drawing fierce public backlash for trivializing a critical human crisis. On the negative side, critics and grieving families fiercely attacked the jarring optics of the venue, pointing out the deeply insensitive sight of students laughing, shooting TikTok trends, eating delivery food, and posing for photo-ops directly alongside a solemn vigil held for aspirants who had committed suicide. This stark contrast—where a site dedicated to mourning young lives lost to systemic failure morphed into a carnival-like party ground—drew sharp condemnation for dishonoring the dead. The optics grew even more damaging as students partied, ate pizzas, and shot comedic reels while Sonam Wangchuk’s health severely deteriorated on a fast just a few feet away, ultimately requiring an emergency police removal to the hospital. Furthermore, the line between constructive satire and political harassment quickly dissolved as several placards and viral edits targeted top administrative figures with crude slurs, vulgar personal attacks, and aggressive character assassinations. These hostile displays led to widespread allegations of third-party political hijacking, alienating neutral observers who felt the serious fight for exam security was being drowned out by sensationalized digital spectacle.


Despite these controversies, the unprecedented fusion of physical sit-ins, meme campaigns, and high-visibility hunger strikes ultimately forced high-level political accountability. Following weeks of sustained agitation, Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan submitted his resignation, the central government enacted the landmark Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act with stringent penalties for paper-leak syndicates, and the Supreme Court ordered a comprehensive overhaul of the National Testing Agency.

 (Author's own opinion)

The Mind Behind Dhoop Khidki Ki...Kartikey Tripathi

Interview by

Aishwarya Siingh

BAJMC Sem 3

Director, Kartikey Tripathi with Aishwarya Siingh

"The more truth you write and show, the more deeply it echoes with people." This belief lies at the heart of Dhoop Khidki Ki, a production that moved audiences with its emotional honesty and quiet realism. Following the performance at Birla Academy of Art & Culture, ASCO caught up with the play's writer and director, Kartikey Tripathi, for a brief conversation. From his journey in theatre to the philosophy behind his storytelling.

  • Which scene in the play is personally your favorite and why?

All scenes are my favourite because they are nothing but a collection of truth and reality that came in front of me.

  • Which character in the play do you relate the most or is your favorite, and why?

Rachna Sharma, because we have seen our mothers, our grandmothers, aunties, masis, didis, maid didi go through the same thing.

  • What is something about theatre that films or OTT platforms can never replace?

Live audience interaction and immediate feedback.

  • What has been the most unexpected lesson theatre has taught you—not just as an artist, but as a person?

The much truth you write and show, the better it will echo with people and they'll love it.

  • Many young people admire theatre but hesitate to pursue it professionally. What would you say to them?

Learn from Rahul Dravid to stay on the pitch.

  • If you had to describe 'धूप खिड़की की' in one word, what would it be?

Empowering.

 

Dhoop Khidki Ki — A Window Through Which Women Perceive Their True Reflection

Theatre Review

Aishwarya Siingh

BAJMC Sem 3


Kartikey Tripathi, writer and director of the play

  
Glimpses from Dhoop Khidki Ki 

Some plays entertain, some provoke thought, and then there are those rare productions that quietly stay with you long after the curtain falls.

Dhoop Khidki Ki, written and directed by Kartikey Tripathi, is one such play. It does not rely on dramatic twists or loud confrontations. Instead, it finds extraordinary depth in the ordinary moments of everyday life—the kind we see daily but seldom question.

Set within the familiar walls of a middle-class household, the story follows Rachna, a homemaker who has spent twenty-nine years nurturing her family: her husband Ramesh, her son Aditya, and her daughter Neha. Alongside her is Pushpa, the family's domestic help, who silently endures domestic violence. Though separated by class, both women carry the same invisible burden: the expectation to keep giving, adjusting, and enduring while their own identities slowly fade.

The audience witnesses countless moments that feel painfully familiar: a son asking his mother not to speak too much in front of his friends because "she doesn't understand"; a husband casually assuming that meals, comfort, and care will always be provided, without ever acknowledging the person behind them. Remarks like "Ladki ho, kam bola karo" and "Yeh tumhara sasural hai, sunna seekho" are not presented as extraordinary acts of cruelty. They are shown exactly as they exist in countless households—ordinary, everyday phrases that quietly shape a woman's life.

The play reminds us that neglect is not always loud; sometimes, it is simply the absence of appreciation. Sometimes love exists, but gratitude quietly disappears.

Perhaps the most moving aspect of the production is that Ramesh and Aditya are not portrayed as villains. They are ordinary men. They love Rachna, but somewhere between routine, responsibility, and societal conditioning, they stop seeing her beyond the roles she performs. She becomes "Maa" and "Wife" before she remains "Rachna." That uncomfortable familiarity is what makes the play so painfully relatable. Emotional neglect, it suggests, is often born not from cruelty, but from habit.

The emotional heartbeat of the play lies in Rachna's diary, written when she was just twenty-one. Hidden between its fading pages are dreams that once felt limitless—traveling, writing books, and discovering a life beyond the four walls of her home. They are dreams she never consciously abandoned; they were simply postponed so many times that they quietly slipped away.

Watching her revisit those pages felt as though every woman in the auditorium paused for a moment and asked herself a deeply personal question:

"When was the last time I met myself?"

Somewhere between becoming an ideal daughter-in-law, a dependable wife, a nurturing mother, and the emotional anchor of an entire household, when did she last spend time with the young girl she once was? The girl who was ambitious, curious, hopeful, and full of dreams. The girl who believed the world was waiting for her.

At what point did that girl quietly disappear?

Perhaps the most heartbreaking truth the play uncovers is that many women do not lose themselves in a single defining moment. They disappear gradually—through postponed dreams, small compromises, and countless acts of love that leave little room for their own aspirations. After years of living for everyone else, they become almost afraid to look back. Afraid to meet the person they once were. Because what if reconnecting with that younger self makes it impossible to continue pretending she never existed? What if remembering those dreams hurts more than forgetting them ever did?

One of the play's most beautiful relationships is between Rachna and her childhood friend, Rashmi Srivastav. Unlike everyone else, Rashmi speaks to Rachna not as someone's wife or mother, but simply as Rachna. Their conversations gently remind her of the dreams she once cherished and the person she had quietly buried beneath years of responsibility. Rashmi never offers dramatic solutions; instead, she offers something far more meaningful—she listens. In many ways, she becomes the emotional anchor Rachna never realized she needed, encouraging her to look inward rather than continue living only for others.

Running alongside this narrative is Pushpa, whose heartbreaking line, "Main bhi toh kisi ki beti hoon," captures the pain of women whose dignity is stripped away behind closed doors. Through Pushpa, the play broadens its message beyond a single household, reminding the audience that while women's struggles may differ, the desire to be respected, heard, and valued is universal.

The performances embrace restraint with remarkable maturity. There are no exaggerated emotional outbursts or melodramatic confrontations; every pause, unfinished sentence, and fleeting glance carries meaning. The minimalist set design, subtle lighting, and understated background score allow the emotions to breathe naturally. The window—the khidki—emerges as one of the play's most powerful symbols, quietly representing hope, forgotten aspirations, and the promise that it is never too late to rediscover the person you used to be.

The diary eventually gives way to letters written to every member of the family. They are not letters of blame, but of love wrapped in honesty. Her message to Neha is particularly touching, urging her daughter never to let the world clip her wings the way life had clipped her own. To Aditya, she gently reminds him that success means little if it is not accompanied by empathy. Even her letter to Ramesh carries no bitterness; she was never asking for grand gestures—she simply wanted someone to notice that she, too, had dreams, fears, and moments of exhaustion.

Dhoop Khidki Ki succeeds because it does not offer easy answers or dramatic resolutions. Instead, it leaves behind questions that linger—questions about gratitude, identity, and the invisible emotional labor that quietly holds families together. By the time the house lights came up, the play had transformed from Rachna's story into something much larger: a reflection of countless women whose dreams were never abandoned, only postponed.

A particularly striking observation came from a senior audience member after the performance. He remarked that the play was not merely about women's struggles, but about their extraordinary courage. "Women were never weak," he said. "Perhaps it was men who were too afraid to recognize just how strong they have always been." It was a thought that lingered long after the evening had ended.

In the end, Dhoop Khidki Ki is not merely a play about sacrifice. It is a poignant reminder that before every woman became someone's wife, mother, or daughter-in-law, she was first an individual with dreams, ambitions, and a name of her own. And perhaps the greatest achievement of the production is that, for a brief evening, it gave many women in the audience the courage to look through that window once again—and remember the girl waiting on the other side.

 Inputs by Rupa Sethia, BAJMC Sem 3