Some censored books in recent times
Hiya Mitra
Books have always been a key source of knowledge. In India, books are called ‘vidya’ and given immense respect. We treat them as equals of the holy relics we swear our faith to. However, humans decided to take advantage of this unspoken invincibility of our only source of knowledge and made their own attempts at rewriting factual history. To counter this malpractice, the rule of censorship was implemented. The first recorded censorship in India dates back to British India. But the Monarch primarily implemented them to suppress political dissent and maintain control. India inherited many of the colonial-era censorship laws after gaining independence in 1947. These laws were adapted and used by the Indian government to address various concerns, including national security, public order, and social sensitivities. Concerns about religious sensitivities, political criticism, and social morality have often driven censorship decisions. The Indian Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and expression, but it also allows for "reasonable restrictions" on this right.
Laws like Section 97 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita give the government power to ban books deemed to promote enmity between groups. The Indian Penal Code also addresses obscenity and related offenses. The Customs Act allows for the prohibition of book imports. In addition to formal government bans, there's a growing trend of "informal censorship" through protests, threats, and pressure on publishers and booksellers. This "mob censorship" can be highly effective in suppressing certain books, even without official bans.
This lead
to wide spread discussions regarding freedom of speech, and the rights of
authors.
"Split: A Life" is the second volume of Taslima Nasrin's autobiography. It details the period of Nasrin's life when she faced intense persecution after becoming a target of the fundamentalists due to her writings, particularly her novel "Lajja" (Shame). It covers her experiences in hiding, the threats she received, and the political and religious backlash against her. It explores her struggles with identity, freedom of expression, and the challenges of being a female writer and doctor in a conservative society. It gives insight into the political and religious tensions of the time period in Bangladesh, and India. It explores themes such as freedom of speech, religious fundamentalism, women's rights, exile and displacement, personal and political identity. It is an important document regarding the fight for secularism, and women’s rights in South Asia. The Khilafat Committee filed a defamation case against her for this book.
"One
Part Woman" is a novel by Indian author Perumal Murugan which explores the
pressures faced by a childless couple, Kali and Ponna, in rural Tamil Nadu. It
delves into themes of societal expectations, particularly regarding fertility
and marriage. It addresses the complexities of gender roles and the desperation
to conform to social norms. The book also touches on topics of religious
customs and how they intersect with personal desires. "One Part
Woman" sparked significant controversy, particularly in India, due to its
depiction of certain cultural and religious practices. Certain caste-based and
religious groups, particularly the Kongu Vellalar Gounder community (to which
the author belongs), found the depiction of the festival offensive and
culturally inaccurate. This controversy led to protests and even threats
against the author, causing Perumal Murugan to declare that he was giving up
writing. The controversy raised important questions about freedom of expression
and the role of literature in addressing sensitive social issues. The Chennai
High Court eventually ruled in favor of the book, defending the authors right
to write. The event caused a large discussion about the pressures that writers
face in India.
The complainant, a leader of a fishermen's association, argued that the book presented a distorted and harmful image of the community. Joe D'Cruz, who himself belongs to the fishing community, defended his work, asserting that it provides a realistic depiction of their lives. He argued that the book brings attention to the struggles of his community. He has stated that the complaints come from those who do not want the truth to be told. The controversy also became entangled with the author's political views, which differed from many in Tamil literary circles.
Currently, many readers have come
forward and defended the content of books. This time it is not the authors
standing alone, but an entire army of readers who have educated themselves on
the topics mentioned. They are ready to raise their voices against those who
try to suppress the text of reason of relevance with the agenda of educating
the ignorant.





No comments:
Post a Comment